U.S.: Dr. James Hansen and Daryl Hannah Arrested in Protest on Mountaintop Removal

In an act of civil disobedience against the highly destructive coal mining practice of Mountain Top removal, NASA climate scientist James Hansen, actor Darryl Hannah, and Michael Brune from the Rainforest Network were arrested along with 28 other people at Coal River Mountain in West Virginia reports the Rainforest Action Network.

Related Websites: Coal River Mountain Watch | Mountain Justice | ilovemountains.org | Videos on Fluxview on Mountaintop Removal | James Hansen's A Plea To President Obama: End Mountaintop Coal Mining | U.S.: "Stars" come out at Coal River

---------------

COAL RIVER VALLEY, W. VA—At a peaceful protest on mountaintop removal today organized by coalfield residents and Rainforest Action Network, leading climate scientist, Dr. James Hansen, actress Daryl Hannah, former Representative Ken Hechler, Michael Brune, the executive director of Rainforest Action Network, and Goldman Prize winner Judy Bonds were arrested along with dozens of Coal River Valley residents and allies. They risked arrest by crossing onto the property of leading mountaintop removal coal mining company, Massey Energy—purposely trespassing to protest the destruction of mountains immediately above the Coal River Valley community.

This is part of a string of increasingly dramatic protests on mountaintop removal and comes after the Obama Administration’s announcement that the EPA will reform, but not abolish, the aggressive strip mining practice. Tuesday’s protest is happening just days before a Congressional hearing titled, “The Impacts of Mountaintop Removal Mining on Water Quality in Appalachia.”

 “I am not a politician; I am a scientist and a citizen,” said Dr. James Hansen. “Politicians may have to advocate for halfway measures if they choose. But it is our responsibility to make sure our representatives feel the full force of citizens who speak for what is right, not what is politically expedient. Mountaintop removal, providing only a small fraction of our energy, should be abolished.”

Two weeks ago, the Obama Administration announced steps to end the fast tracking of certain mountaintop removal coal mine permits and to add tougher enforcement in Appalachia. However, it remains unclear what, if any, improvements this will have on-the-ground in Appalachia or elsewhere. Without a significant change in policy, mining companies will continue to destroy historic mountain ranges and bury community’s drinking water in toxic waste.

“Every day, mountaintop removal mines use more explosive power than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima,” said Bo Webb, an organizer of today’s protest and a Coal River Valley Resident. “West Virginians oppose mountaintop removal in our communities. This is not our traditional way of life, and we do not support the destruction of our land or our communities.”

Coal companies who engage in mountaintop removal mining are clear-cutting thousands of acres of some of the world's most biologically diverse forests. They're burying biologically crucial headwaters streams with blasting debris, releasing toxic levels of heavy metals into the remaining streams and groundwater and poisoning essential drinking water. According to the EPA, this destructive practice has damaged or destroyed nearly 2,000 miles of streams and threatens to destroy 1.4 million acres of forest by 2020.

“We are all complicit in mountaintop removal whenever we turn on our lights, so we are all responsible for ending it. Mountaintop removal, the world's worst strip-mining, is unacceptable. Period.” said Michael Brune, executive director of Rainforest Action Network, a lead supporter of the action today. “This is not a practice that needs to be reformed. It is a practice that needs to be abolished. By sacrificing the Appalachian Mountains for the country's coal addiction, we undermine future investments in 21st century clean energy solutions that will protect our planet, produce more jobs and preserve our natural resources.”

Mountaintop removal coal provides less than eight percent of all coal produced in the United States, and could be replaced with energy efficiency initiatives or renewable energy sources, instead of permitting massive environmental destruction of historic mountain ranges and essential drinking water for a relatively tiny amount of coal.

Recent studies have shown that the Appalachia Mountains could support commercial scale wind energy facilities, which would bring long-term, sustainable jobs to the region – but only if the mountains are left standing. In West Virginia, jobs from mining account for just 3.3% employment in the Mountain State – that is less than 20,000 jobs total. A recent University of Massachusetts study found investing in clean energy projects like wind power and mass transit creates three to four times more jobs than the same expenditure on the coal industry. The wind power sector has grown to employ more Americans than coal mining as demand for clean energy has jumped over the past decade.

===== Press release ends =====

Source: Rainforest Action Network Media Release

Background and related stories:

Yale environment 360 university journal, June 22, 2009 - James Hansen's A Plea To President Obama: End Mountaintop Coal Mining
Indybay, June 24, 2009 - Actress Daryl Hannah, Climate Scientist James Hansen Among 30+ Arrested Protesting Mountaintop Removal in West Virginia
Pittsburgh Indymedia, June 23 - audio - interview with mike roselle at base camp / mt. top removal resistance / blast furnace radi

Related Websites: Coal River Mountain Watch | Mountain Justice | ilovemountains.org | Videos on Fluxview on Mountaintop Removal

Comments

College students protest coal use on campuses

[AP story]


Sky Robinson a Sophmore at the University of Missiouri speaks out against coal


AP – Sky Robinson a Sophmore at the University of Missiouri speaks out against coal burning power plants as …


By ALAN SCHER ZAGIER, Associated Press Writer Alan Scher Zagier, Associated Press Writer

Wed Sep 16, 8:27 pm ET

COLUMBIA, Mo. – College students from Missouri to Oregon are urging their schools to stop using coal-based electricity in favor of cleaner energy sources ranging from wood chips to geothermal power.

On Wednesday, students at the University of Missouri and other schools nationwide mounted a Sierra Club-led
campaign targeting coal-based power at colleges, whether generated at
on-campus plants or purchased from private utilities. The campaign
began the same day a group of college presidents rallied in Washington
in support of clean energy legislation.

Student organizers said colleges have a societal obligation to reduce and eventually eliminate coal use in favor of renewable energy.
At Missouri, the school used more than 48,000 tons of coal to generate
electricity in 2007, accounting for 80 percent of campus energy use.

A
Sierra Club report singled out UCLA, Oregon State, Indiana, Minnesota,
North Carolina and five other schools along with Missouri. The
environmental group identified 60 campuses with their own coal-burning power plants, including Georgia, Penn State and Virginia.

"University
campuses have been at the forefront of many of the most important
movements in history," said Mallory Schillinger, a senior from St.
Louis County. "Global warming is where the fight is at, and the most crucial part of that fight — coal — is located right here on our campus."

In recent years, several schools have opted to forego campus coal plants in response to student protests and regulatory scrutiny.

A 2007 Sierra Club lawsuit charging the University of Wisconsin
with violating federal pollution standards and a subsequent court
ruling led that state's governor to endorse a $251 million project to
convert the school's coal boilers to instead burn paper pellets and
wood chips.

Northern Michigan University withdrew plans to use coal as a backup fuel in its new power plant after the federal Environmental Protection Agency declined to issue an air permit. The new plant will burn only wood products.

And Ball State University is moving to eliminate coal use as it creates what the Sierra Club says is the nation's largest closed geothermal energy system on its campus.

In response to the protest, Missouri's sustainability office issued a statement outlining its efforts to reduce fossil fuel use.

Among
the projects planned is a new biomass boiler that will replace a
coal-fired unit and reduce the school's coal usage by up to 25 percent.
The school is also a member of a broader university presidents' initiative on climate change.

"We're very proud of our sustainability efforts, but we know we have more work to do," said Steve Burdic, Missouri's sustainability coordinator.

Statewide,
Missouri generates more than 80 percent of its electricity from coal.
That reliance accounts for the state having the fourth-lowest energy
prices in the country, according to the American Coalition for Clean
Coal Electricity.

A spokeswoman for the
northern Virginia-based energy group said the new campaign will hurt
the state's economy and could lead to increased college costs for
Missouri students and their families.

"It's
certainly not a proposal the people in Missouri are going to get
behind," said Lisa Camooso Miller. "What is the cost for developing
these kinds of fuel sources?"

____