Rispondi al commento

Which 'delicate balance' is this? None have been made evident as yet in reality and 'opinion' will not create such and again my points are overlooked &/or talked around.

So once more, "Temperature" is but a measure of kinetic energy, represented by the median kinetic velocity of the molecules (as a unit) within the 'sample'. It is ALSO that kinetic energy within a system produces Turbulence.

It is that kinetic energy is propagated by Conduction and Convection, the base processes that produce Turbulence. It is the physical manifestations of kinetic energy that are observed as 'climate' and temperature is only one such measure of these physical manifestations.

It is that the reality we observe in weather patterning is produced by the distribution across the Land surface of the induction of kinetic energy within the materials of the Land surface, and due to the Land surface being unable to exhibit turbulence (unlike liquids of the Ocean and gases of the Atmosphere) the measure of alterations is NOT only mapped by median overall 'temperature' but by relocations of kinetic energy induction by ALTERATIONS of measured temperature across regions.

Temperature within the Land surface IS the manner to discern alterations in rate and distribution of induction within the materials OF the Land surface. The energy measured us however only that residual after conduction and convection have propagated such kinetic energy into the Oceans and Atmosphere, where Pressure differentials produce Turbulence and in doing WORK to move the mass of liquid or gas make that kinetic energy unavailable for measure as Temperature. Altering the surface by 'erosion' or destroying Human constructions also does WORK.

This is NOT any 'concentration' on temperature by me, but instead an observed lack of realisation by a few of WHAT is actually 'meant' when 'temperature' is mentioned. This lack of understanding is seen strongly exhibited within the platforming of 'greenhouse concepts' where the energy suspended as Photons is constantly presented as 'trapped heat', and it is NOT such at all in any manner.

Finally, it is that Uranium IS being emplaced and this NEEDS to be understood as NOT being a 'red herring' and those few still unable to grasp the difference tween misrepresenting the information I give as somehow being 'my opinion' when it IS infact an outline of what IS happening need to realise that and cease attempting to belittle myself, or corrupt my logins so as to prevent me commenting (twice now this has happened).

I have outlined items FROM the common press that can be referenced, this information is all available to those interested in looking, which many have and contacted me already. I would like to update my articles but having my logins constantly and deliberately corrupted means I cannot now login to do so. Staying logged in is so far the solution I have found.

Time for the 'few' to understand reality is NOT formed by opinion. I have outlined WHY the so called 'renewables' are incapable and it is NOTHING to do with the 'technology of generation' that is so often touted. Uranium IS 'happening' unless the 'greenhouse few' are ignored, the longer it takes to overlook 'greenhouse concerns' the stronger will be the presence OF Uranium as the 'backbone generation fuel'.

Your's
Peter K Anderson aka Hartlod
hartlod@bigpond.com
(The word 'Hartlod' in the registered Trademark of Peter K Anderson.)